GAERPSY Publishing uses the OJS platform for all its journals.

All stages of the editorial process, including article submission, communication, peer review, revisions, copyediting, production, and publication, are conducted exclusively through the OJS electronic submission system. Authors or authorized users wishing to submit manuscripts for consideration by the Editorial Board must use the provided Microsoft Word template to help expedite the review process. To register and create a user account, click the “Register” link on the journal’s website. If you already have an account, click “Login.” For any questions regarding the electronic submission process, please contact us at info@gaerpsy.com

AUTHORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES 

Authors are required to adhere to the following responsibilities: 

  • If the manuscript has multiple authors, a corresponding author must be designated to submit the manuscript.
  • The corresponding author assumes primary responsibility for submitting the manuscript, managing all correspondence, making corrections or clarifications, and responding to queries before and after publication.
  • Authors are fully accountable for the accuracy of all personal information submitted to GAERPSY Publishing, including: Full name (first and last), department, institution, country, and ORCID ID.

 PRE-SUBMISSION 

Before submitting a manuscript, authors must ensure the following: 

  • The manuscript is fully prepared for submission, grammatically correct, free of spelling errors, and has been thoroughly checked for accuracy.
  • The content aligns with the journal's mission, aims, and scope.
  • The manuscript complies with the journal’s preparation and formatting guidelines.
  • Proper authorization has been obtained for any third-party images or copyrighted materials included in the manuscript.
  • The submission is complete and includes all required files (e.g., manuscript and cover letter).
  • Compliance with all legal, ethical, and moral standards is maintained. Authors must not submit content containing offensive language, aggression, or discrimination based on national origin, religion, race, color, sex, disability, or age. Such content is illegal and violates the journal’s code of conduct.
  • Authors are responsible for the accuracy of all statements, ideas, results, conclusions, terminology, names, and citations presented in the manuscript.

 PEER REVIEW AND EDITORIAL PROCEDURES 

All manuscripts undergo thorough peer review. Reviewers provide detailed feedback on strengths, weaknesses, scientific rigor, methodology, originality, significance, and clarity. They may recommend additional analyses or experiments if necessary. The editor makes the final decision based on reviewers’ comments. Possible outcomes include: 

  • Accept
  • Accept with minor revisions
  • Major revisions required
  • Revise and resubmit
  • Reject
  • Submit elsewhere

 When revisions are required, authors will be asked to address all reviewer comments and resubmit both the revised manuscript and a correction table for further evaluation. The peer-review process is confidential and double-anonymous. Reviewers’ identities are not revealed to authors, and authors’ identities are not revealed to reviewers. This ensures fairness, objectivity, and evaluation based solely on scientific merit. Overall, peer review is essential in maintaining the integrity and quality of scholarly publishing by ensuring the dissemination of reliable, high-quality research. 

EDITORIAL DECISION 

After completing all required procedures, the editorial office will issue an official acceptance letter confirming that your manuscript has been accepted for publication.