2 min read

Abstract—Effective implementation of sign language-based instruction is crucial for providing quality education to deaf learners at special schools. Teachers experienced challenges to effectively implement sign language policies for the deaf learners in Zimbabwean special schools. However, this study explores how teachers implement sign language regulatory frameworks for deaf Learners in special schools. Drawing on qualitative data from teachers, headmasters,  school  inspectors,  and  psychologists.  The  findings revealed critical gaps in the in-service  training  and professional development opportunities available to teachers serving deaf leaners. Despite teachers reporting difficulties  with  sign  language  fluency  and  inadequate  understanding  of  deaf  culture  and  pedagogy,  the  study  found a disconnect between teachers' expressed needs and the perspectives of district-level officials, who often did not  perceive  additional  training  as  necessary.  The  study  further highlights  the  heavy  reliance  on  support  from  external donor organisations and NGOs to provide teachers with limited sign language workshops and resources. This  overreliance  on  precarious  external  funding  sources  compromises  the  sustainability  and  scalability  of  professional development initiatives. The study's implications call for a comprehensive, government-led strategy to  ensure  all  teachers  in  seaf  schools  receive  robust,  long-term  training  in  sign  language,  deaf  education  methodologies, and deaf cultural competence. Strengthening the capacity of the teaching workforce is essential for upholding the rights of deaf learners to receive instruction in their primary language and achieving meaningful implementation of sign language policies. This study contributes vital empirical evidence to inform policy reforms and teacher training programmes to support using Zimbabwean Sign Language as a medium of instruction for the deaf.

Keywords:  Sign  language  policies,  Deaf  learners,  Mother  tongue,  Special  schools,  Policy  implementation,  Total  communication  https://doi.org/10.38140/ijsie.v1i1.1289